Great comment!

For a group that's dead-set against government propaganda, it's really sad to see how they are propagandizing and taking advantage of this young girl, simply because they can't think through their own logic.
Yes, we do not see the planets Mercury or Venus in the middle of the night. They are not in the night sky. You can see Venus, which is usually the easiest planet to identify, because it is always close to the sun, near the horizon just before dawn or just after sunset. It's only ever in the middle of the sky, in the middle of the day, when it's too bright to see but we still know it's there.

Your judgement is that the government is taking advantage of people (you included), by indoctrinating you in school with propaganda right?
Learn from the little girl. Stars are visible mainly at night. Those that observe stars observe them at night.

Also check out this old post Distortions for some billion light years bending stars that are not there but are there due to bent years spent before reaching our apparatus.

Yes, the government is taking advantage of people by indoctrinating them in school. The girl should certainly be pulled out of school, but not propagandized by her father and grandfather with nonsense.
Stars are mainly visible at night, but Mercury and Venus are not included in that, and nobody ever claimed they were. They gave her a straw man to get her to distrust the government. No need to do that when the government is wrong about so much, anyway.

Seriously? Both Mercury and Venus are included in that. In fact Venus is a bright morning star that it lingers to the day from the night.

Morning, not night. Nobody believes Mercury or Venus are in the night sky. You can't see Mercury with the naked eye. And Venus is the most easily recognized "star" that is always close to the sun. That's why you sometimes see it in the morning (leading the sun up) or in the evening (following the sun just after it goes past the horizon), but never in the middle of the night. Mercury stays even closer to the sun. Neither is in the night sky.

You are sending AI stuff.
Men at NASA were not the people that named Mercy and Venus and drew their maps or used their maps for navigation.
It doesn't follow the sun.
What you have been indoctrinated with is the issue here. They are lights (stars), and not planes. Stop picturing your indoctrination. They are up in the sky and only show more when the light of the sun is not overshadowing theirs.

I never said NASA was responsible for anything. They are a demonic organization.
I was wrong about Mercury, though; I thought it was not visible to the naked eye, but apparently that's not true. However, it's also not in the night sky. Never was. Neither is Venus. Both of them, from our perspective on Earth, either lead or follow the sun's trajectory, depending on their position around the sun.
Certainly Venus doesn't linger in the night sky and then appear over the Eastern Horizon (and then drop below the Eastern horizon? Is that what you're suggesting?). Are you implying that Venus' path through the sky goes West to East? No star does. Everything in the sky, from our perspective, goes East to West; that's true of the sun, the moon, and every single star. The only time that's not true is if you are very close to one of the poles.
So if Venus appears in the morning, it is leading the Sun, and if it appears in the evening, it is following the sun. But it's always near the sun.

No. The sun has an entirely different course. The stars, a different one.
30 degrees celsius?

Are you saying the apparent motion of the sun around the Earth is not East to West? That would mean the sun does not rise in the East or does not set in the West. Is that what you're claiming?
If so, you are delusional.
My comment about "30 degrees" was referencing the angle distance between the sun and Venus. It had nothing to do with temperature or celsius. The greatest angle of separation between them will happen in January next year, at which point they will be 47 degrees. Venus is always at least that close to the sun. We only ever see it in the morning or in the evening, always in front of or behind the sun, and when we see it, it is almost always the brightest "star" in the sky.

See. I follow the Bible and not devilish propaganda especially in our time.
You only see it in your AI.
Indoctrination at work LIVE. So 47 degrees angle of separation by January?

I also follow the Bible, as a Creationist, and believe Genesis is meant to be read literally. But it does NOT follow that the Earth is flat. Nowhere in Genesis does it say that, or imply it.
You are taking one interpretation of what the Bible says, which was never taught by the Church, and believing it as Gospel even though there are many other ways people have interpreted those words, even literally, throughout history.
A flat Earth is not possible, and I've given you the reasons why I know that to be the case. You haven't even attempted to respond to the proof that I gave in another post about the apparent size of the sun and moon at the horizons, which disproves flat-earth entirely. On a flat earth, it is not possible for the apparent size of the sun or moon to INCREASE early in the morning or late at night, and yet they often do. The globe model explains that behavior. Flat earth would make it impossible.
If you think the stars or the sun or the moon do not appear to us on the Eastern horizon and then follow paths through the night sky until they disappear on the Western horizon, you have never looked at the sky yourself. It's probably best if you get your head out of the computer screen and go outside for a change.

Since you follow the Bible. Do you believe that the sun is what runs its course circling the earth?
I've told you those you call flat-earthers can easily explain that to you. You are like I want to see EVERYTHING before I believe. If you love truth, 1 is enough for you.

I think it is very likely that the earth is the center of the universe and that the sun circles around the earth. Even atheist scientists (such as Stephen Hawking) admitted there's no way to prove that's not the case.
You are a flat-earther, and you haven't explained anything in a way that even presents logical evidence against the globe model, and I've now looked at about a dozen of your posts on it. I have watched and read hours and hours of material from flat earthers several years ago. Some of it was interesting enough to want me to dig deeper, so I did. Now I am very confident the Earth is a globe, and not flat.
I do love truth, and it is exactly because I love truth that I am not satisfied unless I can explain the truth, excepting of course my understanding of the nature of God. Regarding the shape of the Earth, I am sure about the truth. Regarding the position of Earth in the universe, I'm not 100% sure, but I don't need to be, because I know that God created it, and that at the very least, we are the center of the universe in a spiritual sense. Everything else is moot, anyway.

Which one? Is the earth the center and is it bigger than the sun?

I already answered the first. Is it bigger than the sun? No, clearly not.
Do you think the Bible suggests that it is?

Says so.
So according to you. The big ball Sun goes around the small ball Earth?
NASA is wrong with various results of their "satellites"?

The Bible does not say the sun is smaller than the Earth.
NASA has made up a lot of stuff. That's undeniable. That doesn't mean the Earth is flat.
If you're questioning the existence of satellites, that's ridiculous. You can see them with the naked eye, and I have on many occasions.

Red blinking light? The sun was placed in the firmament of heaven.
You said "NASA has made up a lot of stuff."
So a big ball Sun is revolving around a small ball Earth?
In the beginning, God created heaven and earth.

No, not a red blinking light.
That passage says nothing about size.

What is going on?